Cisco qualifications can be purchasing significantly magnitude inside it sector day by day. Point in time is evolving quickly. And thus countless modifications are being in every niche. This niche isnt extraordinary using their company fields. You then have a should keep current with existing experience plus informations to indicate your current really worth with your useful niche. Cisco authenticates your understanding, knowledge, skills plus functionality. You can show your current toughness for do the job by way of purchasing qualifications.. This particular qualifications provides noticeable modifications to a specialized knowledge today specialized. Build your specialized occupation brilliant utilizing review 300-135.

2021 Dec tshoot 300-135 quick reference:

Q31. - (Topic 16) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept'. After several changes to the network addressing, routing schemes, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that the loopback address on R1 (2026::111:1) is not able to ping the loopback address on DSW2(2026::102:1). 

Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

What is the solution to fault condition? 

A. Under the interface Serial 0/0/0.23 configuration enter the ipv6 ospf 6 area 0 command. 

B. Under the interface Serial0/0/0.12 configuration enter the ipv6 ospf 6 area 12 command. 

C. Under ipv6 router ospf 6 configuration enter the network 2026::1:/122 area 0 command. 

D. Under ipv6 router ospf 6 configuration enter no passive-interface default command. 

Answer:

Explanation: 

On R2, IPV6 OSPF routing, configuration is required to add ipv6 ospf 6 area 0 under interface serial 0/0/0.23 


Q32. - (Topic 11) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. 

Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

The fault condition is related to which technology? 

A. BGP 

B. NTP 

C. IP NAT 

D. IPv4 OSPF Routing 

E. IPv4 OSPF Redistribution 

F. IPv6 OSPF Routing 

G. IPv4 layer 3 security 

Answer:

Explanation: 

On R1, we need to permit IP 209.65.200.222/30 under the access list. 


Q33. - (Topic 13) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. 

Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

On which device is the fault condition located? 

A. R1 

B. R2 

C. R3 

D. R4 

E. DSW1 

F. DSW2 

G. ASW1 

H. ASW2 

Answer:

Explanation: 

On R4, in the redistribution of EIGRP routing protocol, we need to change name of route-map to resolve the issue. It references route-map OSPF_to_EIGRP but the actual route map is called OSPF->EIGRP. 


Q34. - (Topic 14) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. 

Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

On which device is the fault condition located? 

A. R1 

B. R2 

C. R3 

D. R4 

E. DSW1 

F. DSW2 

G. ASW1 

H. ASW2 

Answer:

Explanation: 

The EIGRP AS number configured on R4 is wrong. 


Most recent pentax 18-135 vs 55-300:

Q35. - (Topic 1)

Which IPsec mode will encrypt a GRE tunnel to provide multiprotocol support and reduced overhead?

A. 3DES

B. multipoint GRE

C. tunnel

D. transport

Answer: D


Q36. - (Topic 5) 

Scenario: A customer network engineer has edited their OSPF network configuration and now your customer is experiencing network issues. They have contacted you to resolve the issues and return the network to full functionality. 

The 6.6.0.0 subnets are not reachable from R4. how should the problem be resolved? 

A. Edit access-list 46 in R6 to permit all the 6.6.0.0 subnets 

B. Apply access-list 46 in R6 to a different interface 

C. Apply access-list 1 as a distribute-list out under router ospf 100 in R4 

D. Remove distribute-list 64 out on R6 E. Remove distribute-list 1 in ethernet 0/1 in R4 

F. Remove distribute-list 1 in ethernet 0/0 in R4 

Answer:

Explanation: 

Here we see from the running configuration of R6 that distribute list 64 is being used in the outbound direction to all OSPF neighbors. 

However, no packets will match the 6.6.0.0 in this access list because the first line blocks all 6.0.0.0 networks, and since the 6.6.0.0 networks will also match the first line of this ACL, these OSPF networks will not be advertised because they are first denied in the first line of the ACL. 


Q37. - (Topic 4) 

Scenario: 

You have been asked by your customer to help resolve issues in their routed network. Their network engineer has deployed HSRP. On closer inspection HSRP doesn't appear to be operating properly and it appears there are other network problems as well. You are to provide solutions to all the network problems. 

The following debug messages are noticed for HSRP group 2. But still neither R1 nor R2 has identified one of them as standby router. Identify the reason causing the issue. 

Note: only show commands can be used to troubleshoot the ticket. 

R1# 

'Mar 26 11:17:39.234: HSRP: Et1/0 Grp 2 Hello out 172.16.20.2 Active pri 100 vIP 

172.16.20.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:40.034: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello out 172.16.10.2 Active prj 130 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

R1# 

'Mar 26 11:17:40.364: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello in 172.16.10.1 Standby pri 100 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

R1# 

'Mar 26 11:17:41.969: HSRP: Et1/0 Grp 2 Hello out 172.16.20.2 Active pri 100 vIP 172.16.20.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:42.719: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello out 172.16.10.2 Active prj 130 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:42.918: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello in 172.16.10.1 Standby pri 100 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

R1# 

'Mar 26 11:17:44.869: HSRP: Et1/0 Grp 2 Hello out 172.16.20.2 Active pri 100 vIP 

172.16.20.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:45.485: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello out 172.16.10.2 Active prj 130 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:45.718: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello in 172.16.10.1 Standby pri 100 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

R1# 

'Mar 26 11:17:47.439: HSRP: Et1/0 Grp 2 Hello out 172.16.20.2 Active pri 100 vIP 

172.16.20.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:48.252: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello in 172.16.10.1 Standby pri 100 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:48.322: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello out 172.16.10.2 Active prj 130 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

R1# 

'Mar 26 11:17:50.389: HSRP: Et1/0 Grp 2 Hello out 172.16.20.2 Active pri 100 vIP 

172.16.20.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:50.735: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello in 172.16.10.1 Standby pri 100 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:50.921: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello out 172.16.10.2 Active prj 130 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

R1# 

'Mar 26 11:17:53.089: HSRP: Et1/0 Grp2 Hello out 172.16.20.2 Active pri 100 vIP 

172.16.20.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:53.338: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello out 172.16.10.2 Active pri130vlP 

172.16.10.254 

'Mar 26 11:17:53.633: HSRP: EtO/0 Grp 1 Hello in 172.16.10.1 Standby pri 100 vIP 

172.16.10.254 

A. HSRP group priority misconfiguration 

B. There is an HSRP authentication misconfiguration 

C. There is an HSRP group number mismatch 

D. This is not an HSRP issue: this is DHCP issue. 

E. The ACL applied to interface is blocking HSRP hello packet exchange 

Answer:

Explanation: 

On R1 we see that access list 102 has been applied to the Ethernet 1/0 interface: 

This access list is blocking all traffic to the 224.0.0.102 IP address, which is the multicast address used by HSRP. 

Topic 5, Troubleshooting OSPF 

17. - (Topic 5) 

Scenario: 

A customer network engineer has edited their OSPF network configuration and now your customer is experiencing network issues. They have contacted you to resolve the issues and return the network to full functionality. 

Connectivity from R3 to R4, R5 and R6 has been lost. How should connectivity be reestablished? 

A. Configure R4 with a virtual link to 192.168.13.2 

B. Change the R3 and R4 hello-interval and retransmit-interface timers to zero so the link won't go down. 

C. Add an OSPF network statement for 4.4.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 1 in R3 

D. Add an OSPF network statement for 192.168.34.3 0.0.0.255 area 2 in R3 

E. Add an OSPF network statement for 192.168.34.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 in R3 

Answer:

Explanation: 

Based on the network diagram, we know that a virtual link will need to be configured to logically connect area 2 to the back area 0. However, this is not the problem as we can see that R3 has been correctly configured to do this. It is, however, missing the network statement for the link to R4. Here, we see that the link to R4 is using the 192.168.34.0 network, but that this network has not been added to OSPF 

Based on the network diagram, this link should be added to Area 1, not Area 2. 


Q38. - (Topic 20) 

The implementation group has been using the test bed to do an IPv6 'proof-of-concept1.

After several changes to the network addressing and routing schemes, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that the loopback address on R1 (2026::111:1) is not able to ping the loopback address on DSW2 (2026::102:1).

The fault condition is related to which technology?

A. NTP

B. IP DHCP Server

C. IPv4 OSPF Routing

D. IPv4 EIGRP Routing

E. IPv4 Route Redistribution

F. IPv6 RIP Routing

G. IPv6 OSPF Routing

H. IPV4 and IPV6 Interoperability

I. IPv4 layer 3 security

Answer: G

Explanation:

As explained earlier, the problem is with route redistribution on R4 of not redistributing RIP routes into OSPF for IPV6.